Field Psychology

Sign in Subscribe

Adjacent

Jung: the return of the opposite, without the hidden hand

Carl Jung mapped the territory this model formalizes: the shadow as the excluded psychological material; enantiodromia as the violent return of the neglected pole; compensation as the psyche’s tendency to answer one-sidedness with its opposite. No tradition observed the phenomena more closely. The difference is in the underlying

Analytic idealism: Kastrup’s dissociation and the filter

Bernardo Kastrup’s analytic idealism is the closest contemporary metaphysics to the intuition behind this model: one field of mentation, with individual minds as dissociated alters of it. The convergences are deep — a single experiential ground, transpersonal phenomena as structural default rather than anomaly, a field that does not deliberate.

The analytic field: Baranger, Ferro, and what precedes the consulting room

Within psychoanalysis, the word field has its own lineage. Madeleine and Willy Baranger described the analytic situation as a bipersonal field — a structure with dynamics irreducible to either participant, including the bastión: the unconscious complicity that can silently immobilize an analysis. Antonino Ferro extended the field concept into a full