Field Psychology

Sign in Subscribe

karina firme

What does Field Psychology say

This model challenges the isolated-mind premise — a paradigm widely assumed: that minds are sealed units, and whatever is shared must somehow cross between them. We start by observing that the existing model falls short of explaining many observed interpersonal phenomena and proceed to develop a naturalistic model that describes

Jung: the return of the opposite, without the hidden hand

Carl Jung mapped the territory this model formalizes: the shadow as the excluded psychological material; enantiodromia as the violent return of the neglected pole; compensation as the psyche’s tendency to answer one-sidedness with its opposite. No tradition observed the phenomena more closely. The difference is in the underlying

Analytic idealism: Kastrup’s dissociation and the filter

Bernardo Kastrup’s analytic idealism is the closest contemporary metaphysics to the intuition behind this model: one field of mentation, with individual minds as dissociated alters of it. The convergences are deep — a single experiential ground, transpersonal phenomena as structural default rather than anomaly, a field that does not deliberate.

The analytic field: Baranger, Ferro, and what precedes the consulting room

Within psychoanalysis, the word field has its own lineage. Madeleine and Willy Baranger described the analytic situation as a bipersonal field — a structure with dynamics irreducible to either participant, including the bastión: the unconscious complicity that can silently immobilize an analysis. Antonino Ferro extended the field concept into a full

Roles in groups: where the excluded stabilizes

Family systems research established that groups distribute what they cannot hold: the member who carries the anger, the one who carries the vulnerability, the identified patient who says what the system cannot. This model adds a specific, testable claim about the distribution: excluded capacities stabilize in the members least defended

Scrolling, reciprocity, and the boundary of the self

Hours of scrolling are not an absence of social signal — they are the densest social signal a nervous system has ever received: faces, voices, direct address. What is absent is the other half of the circuit. The person sees without being seen; the recognition system is continuously activated and the

Measuring porosity without circularity

Porosity — how much of the surrounding field enters a person — does explanatory work in this model only if it can be measured independently of the outcomes it predicts. A scale that infers porosity from distress, and then predicts distress, predicts nothing. The requirement, stated as a constraint: a porosity measure